Thursday, 15 May 2008

"If mothering is a luxury, it's children who pay the price."

It's not often I agree with this lady. What she said about Fiona MacKeown, for example, disgusted me. But this week, she's said something worth saying about motherhood and I'm glad she has.

This blog post recently put me onto this book which, although it's written about the situation in the US, covers factors relevant to the UK situation as well. The most interesting of these (to me) was the reason it gives for the exponential rise in house prices which the authors (Amelia Warren Tyagi and her mother Elizabeth Warren) blame on the state of the school system. Families, they contend, will pay everything they can possibly borrow for the premium of sending their child to a decent school. This fact in itself has led to both parents needing to work full-time in most American middle class families, which in turn renders them more economically vulnerable than if only one worked.

I'm still reading, but am yet to find mention of what seems to me to be the obvious solution - don't use the schools? Instead, they advocate a system of school vouchers so that parents don't have to buy the house to get the school place. That might work as well, I suppose, but I'd like to see school vouchers as well as optional attendance. I think we'd get some really decent educational provision from our schools if that were the case.

It's an idea I first heard from Roland Meighan and it makes perfect sense to me, as does everything else I've heard him say.

3 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Urgh this strikes a chord. We just found out our daughter didn't get into the state school we wanted... in fact we didn't get ANY of our three choices!

I considered home-schooling (I alread am with her to a degree) but the type of personality my daugher has means she really does need the extra socialization a school can give.

My ideal would be some kind of part-time schooling... you know home-school for part of the week and attend a school for the rest. I'd love to see the introduction of that form of "optional attendance", as whilst am a big advocate of home-schooling I don't believe it's right for everyone. Some kind of flexible ttendance would be great and could be truly tailored o each child.

As it is, in our case, we have found a private school that we love and trust and seems ideally suited to our daughter. Private school mans money of course and the up-shot is that I will need to return to work sooner than I hoped. I'm hoping that I can work some nights maybe until my second child is at school though.

15 May 2008 at 11:58  
Blogger Gill said...

Yes I agree, that's the big problem with schools Jenna: the all-or-nothing deal. Even flexi-schooling usually requires that you teach your child according to National Curriculum in the home part of the deal.

If they ditched the NC - and all formal, compulsory learning and just ran schools as drop-in, voucher funded learning centres for all children to use as and when they wanted... well. Dream on, huh?

Good luck with your situation, though I've got to say re: socialising, that I know some home ed children who socialise much more than school children do. (Bear in mind school children are often prevented from chatting in class!) It depends where you live really. If you're near a city or major town you can be socialising in home ed groups just about all day every day if you want to.

16 May 2008 at 06:02  
Blogger Allie said...

"If you're near a city or major town you can be socialising in home ed groups just about all day every day if you want to."

You certainly can, and we pretty much do!

16 May 2008 at 10:22  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home