Wednesday, 30 July 2008

The government is planning to abolish Income Support

I've known about this since news of it appeared on the home ed lists a couple of weeks ago, and wearily thought it was about time I got around to blogging it. It's a DWP Green Paper setting out "plans for improving support and work incentives to create a system that rewards responsibility".

My thoughts about it won't surprise anyone, but I'll set them out briefly here, for clarity:
  • "Improving support" is one thing, but trying to make the take-up of that 'support' compulsory is a whole other, less ethical thing. I wish they'd stop dressing up coercion and trying to pretend it's something else.

  • My dictionary definition of the word 'work' does not imply that this solely consists of activities known about and condoned by the government for which money is received and tax paid. Our language is being manipulated to suit HM Treasury.

  • Responsibility has its own reward, thank you very much. I have lots of responsibility, and lots of reward.

  • The incentive to do paid work would presumably be the salary. Is this not enough?

  • Children are not best brought up by strangers in institutions, while both of their parents are in paid employment. This will dehumanise them, making it difficult for them to put down roots and know where they belong in the world. Two hours of frantic and fraught parental care in the evening plus one in the morning does not constitute an upbringing, by the way.

  • Fine: abolish Income Support. It's not fair that the slightly more wealthy in this country should be made to fund the slightly less wealthy anyway. But give us back our birthright instead. Give us access to our land again, so that we can build houses for ourselves that we can afford to live in, produce our own food and give our children the freedom and space to play and learn, instead of trying to make slaves out of us and prisoners out of our children.


I've made use of the word 'trying' a couple of times in the above points, because luckily, try is all the government can do. People will still find ways of avoiding the traps, no matter how carefully they're set. Family life is too precious to throw away for the sake of a few pounds.

For what it's worth, there's to be a consultation on this, to which I will probably be contributing, even though I think it's a waste of time because the decision has been made now by both major political parties and the only real debate is about how it will be implemented.

13 Comments:

Blogger Allie said...

Hi there,

While I am not at all in favour of the govt's ideas about benefit 'reform', I'm not really sure that this would work on a large scale:

"Give us access to our land again, so that we can build houses for ourselves that we can afford to live in, produce our own food"

If you look at the level of population of this country back when people were existing off the land through subsistence farming, it wasn't anything like the number of people who live here now. I don't think it would work as a solution on a large scale. Also, what about the people who don't want to build houses and grow their own food?

30 July 2008 at 19:10  
Blogger Gill said...

Hi Allie,

Good point - I knew that really ;-)

But maybe the number of people who were unwilling or unable to make use of a parcel of land would be somewhere near the number there wasn't room for!

The abstract - but very real - point I'm trying to make is that we only need the Income Support because living is so expensive, and it really shouldn't be, because basic essential resources are plentiful in this country.

If we all had the means to access our own resources then we couldn't be held over a barrel to 'work' [ = attend a paid job for 40 hrs a week, which is probably often less real 'work' than most full-time parents do in an average week] for money to get them.

And the prices of the essential resources wouldn't fluctuate so wildly either, being no longer at the mercy of speculators and profiteers.

30 July 2008 at 19:33  
Blogger Allie said...

Basic, essential resources are very open to interpretation! Personally I need tea. I can't see myself managing a tea crop on my little bit of land in the UK! We are all bound up in this system. I'm all for people following their dreams and finding their own way through the maze but there's no way that everyone can be a tiny landowner. And some of us want to live in cities... I don't know, the more I think about it the more complicated it gets...

30 July 2008 at 21:03  
Blogger Gill said...

LOL, I can just picture you nursing your little tea plants..!

Yes I agree - we've all become very dependent on cheap imports, haven't we? Is that to the detriment or the benefit of the exporting countries, I wonder?

It is incredibly complex, which is perhaps why I keep trying to simplify it in my own mind. Everyone really just needs food, fuel and shelter, which this country is abundant with.

You could have a little boggy solar-heated greenhouse for your tea ;-)

30 July 2008 at 21:14  
Blogger Gill said...

Duh... it's just occured to me that greenhouses are all solar-heated, aren't they?!

I meant with a panel thing..

31 July 2008 at 06:42  
Blogger Gill said...

That's another serious point though Allie - we've got more technology and access to knowledge now than we had when we were last all subsistent farming, so we could potentially produce more food per the amount of growing space we've got.

I heard something interesting on the radio the other day along these lines. Someone from the BBC had sneaked into Zimbabwe and was reporting on the effects of the rampant inflation there and the collapsing economy. The anchor person asked where it would lead, what would happen next? And the correspondent said:

"African countries don't ever really go bankrupt. They just slip back into subsistence farming and bartering when their money systems stop working effectively."

And this is something that's probably a bit embarrassing for Western media people (and politicians, business people.. anyone dependent on our present economic structure) to have to admit, because in actual fact, it's what any country with rampant inflation would do. And I wonder if Africa is arguably better placed to do it than we are, because although its climate might be more challenging, it will probably still have more efficient social networks than ours, and more working memory of how to live from the land.

Can you stock up on tea bags, Allie? I think I'd be filling my cupboards with it if I felt I really needed a cuppa to get me through the day. We certainly planted spuds here this year, which is something I only bother to do when the economy starts looking dodgy. Not that I planted anywhere near enough of them!

31 July 2008 at 07:05  
Blogger Allie said...

I don't think I'll bother about stocking up on tea bags. They wouldn't be very nice after a few years, would they? No, if I had to adjust then I would.

I also choose to live in the moment, rather than in a looming future of doom. It isn't that I have my head in the sand, I just believe that the best way of surviving the future is to hang onto core beliefs - in people, love, sanity - and hope. I think people are pretty rubbish at predictions, in general, and history is full of surprises. For this reason, I could never sign up to a far-left revolutionary group in my youth. It was too much like religion for my taste - "this is going to happen". The one thing I am sure of is that no-one knows what's going to happen. One of the key unknowns is how people will behave when it does!

I think, if push comes to shove and we have to live radically different lives, then we will have to find large-scale, collective solutions, like rationing. Round here, there have been some workshops being run as part of the 'transition towns' thing. It's all very nice but, as I said to Dani, if the future pans out the way these people are predicting, it's going to take more than a bit of home-grown chard and sewing sequins on your old blouse...

1 August 2008 at 10:38  
Blogger Gill said...

I came off tea a couple of months ago, after being a hopeless addict for years. Got a very bad headache for a few days, but apart from that it was easy. I always said I could stop any time ;-) Now I'm hooked on red bush tea (from South Africa I think) and rice milk from rice grown in India or somewhere, though I don't think I'd get the headache without that.

I don't have doom in my mind - just the knowledge that nothing stays the same and that the way we live isn't sustainable and can't last. I don't build up emergency food stocks, but I have always wondered how my family would cope without shops and other trappings of modern civilisation. Wondered - not worried, because I'm confident that we would cope, as would most other people.

I agree, nobody knows what's going to happen - except that things will change, one way or another.

1 August 2008 at 11:11  
Blogger Allie said...

I know you're not into doom. It really isn't your style, is it? You're a do-er, not a navel gazer, aren't you?

I agree that the way we're going on isn't sustainable. I often marvel at what we now consider 'essentials' that would have been considered incredible luxuries only a couple of generations ago. I'm all for a simpler life - as long as it doesn't have to be rural! I get twitchy in the country...

1 August 2008 at 14:57  
Blogger Gill said...

Yes I suppose I do like to get on with things. What's up with the country, then, Allie? You don't like to feel soft grass under your bare feet? It's my favourite thing about summer :-)

2 August 2008 at 06:47  
Blogger Allie said...

I don't mind the country for a day out - even for a holiday. But I like urban life. I like the way you can disappear into the crowd. I like to watch people go by and I love the busy buzz of our city. If you go into town the buskers alone are a reason to smile. I guess it's probably just another aspect of feeling at home.

2 August 2008 at 19:18  
Blogger Gill said...

Yes, I'm sure you're right about that.

City life really does need money though, doesn't it? (Does it?) Unless you've got an allotment or something and even that needs to have its rent paid for.

One thing I do like about this country is that you still can opt out of the money system, even though it takes some major lifestyle changes.

3 August 2008 at 06:41  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have always held the suspicion that Labour is the party of hard graft and institutionalised upbringing of children.

This is why they want parents to work in menial jobs and send their children to school and childminders rather than spend quality time with them.

I used to live in a Lancashire town with many (defunct) cotton mills and over half of it's children got free nursery education. I then moved to Hampshire with very little in the way of heavy industry or state nursery education.

9 August 2008 at 12:27  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home